A breakeven stop is a stop-loss that has been moved up to your entry price after a trade has already gone your way. From that moment the position can no longer lose money on paper: the worst case is that you get out roughly where you got in. On our track record, a signal that ends this way is tagged "BE Stop" and recorded as a flat, zero-profit outcome.
You buy a stock at $100 with a stop-loss at $95 — so you are risking $5 a share. The stock runs to $110. You are up $10 a share, on paper. Now the uncomfortable question: if it falls back to $95, do you really want to hand back the $10 you just made and lose the original $5 on top?
That is the situation a breakeven stop is designed for. Once a trade has moved meaningfully in your favour, you slide the stop up from $95 to $100 — your own entry price. The trade has now, in the ordinary case, become a free option: it can still run to $120, but it can no longer take money out of your pocket. Traders call this "taking the risk off the table."
Our paper-trading engine does not move the stop on a hunch or on a percentage. It moves it on one specific event: the first take-profit level (TP1) is reached, and a second take-profit level (TP2) exists above it. In plain terms — the trade hit its first target, we banked that milestone, and there is still further upside we are holding on for. At that moment, and only then, the stop is relocated to the entry price.
If a signal has no TP2 — no further target to hold for — then hitting TP1 simply closes the trade. There is nothing left to protect, so there is no breakeven leg. The breakeven stop exists purely to protect a position that is still open because it is reaching for a bigger target.
One timing detail worth knowing, because it is the kind of thing backtests quietly cheat on: the breakeven stop is only checked from the next daily bar onward, never on the same bar that hit TP1. A stock that spikes to its first target and slumps back to your entry within a single session is not recorded as a breakeven exit. We would rather understate the rule than claim intraday precision that daily data cannot support.
Example (illustrative — invented numbers chosen to show the mechanics, not our results). Entry $100, stop $95, TP1 $110, TP2 $125. The risk on the trade is $5 a share, so one unit of risk — one R — is $5.
Day 8: the stock trades up through $110. TP1 is reached and TP2 exists, so the position stays open and the stop moves from $95 to $100. Day 9 onward, three things can happen. It runs to $125 and closes at TP2, worth +5R ($25 of profit per $5 risked). It drifts sideways until the time stop closes it wherever it is. Or it rolls over, touches $100, and the breakeven stop fires — recorded as 0R.
That third branch is the one this page is about. A "BE Stop" on the track record does not mean the signal was wrong. It means the signal was right first and wrong second: it went far enough to reach its first target, then gave the move back before the bigger thesis played out. The badge exists precisely so you can see how often that happens rather than having those trades quietly disappear into the "flat" pile.
The breakeven leg is modelled in our forward paper-trading log — the record of signals tracked from the moment they were published. It is deliberately not modelled in the published historical backtest, where the stop stays where it started. This matters when you read the two side by side: they are answering slightly different questions, and the backtest is the more pessimistic of the two on this specific mechanic.
We flag that asymmetry rather than smoothing it over, because a breakeven rule is exactly the kind of retrospective flourish that makes a backtest look better than the strategy that actually ran.
First, and most importantly: it is not free. Every breakeven stop you set is a trade you might otherwise have held. Stocks routinely dip back through the level they broke out from before continuing higher — that shakeout is normal market behaviour, not a failed thesis. Moving the stop to entry converts a chunk of your would-be winners into zeros. You are buying peace of mind with expected profit, and the price is real.
Second, the zero is an idealisation. Our log records a breakeven exit as exactly 0R. In the real world you would pay commission and slippage, and — far worse — a stock that gaps down overnight opens below your entry and fills you there, not at your stop. A gap does not politely stop at the level you chose. Treat 0R as "approximately flat, in a market that traded through the level rather than jumping over it."
Third, breakeven stops flatter your win rate while doing nothing for your expectancy. A strategy that converts losses into scratches looks much tidier and may make no more money. If you compare two strategies, compare the average R per trade, not the share of trades that avoided a loss.
The signal reached its first take-profit target, the stop was then moved up to the entry price to protect the open profit, and the price later fell back to that entry level and closed the trade. It is recorded as a flat, zero-profit outcome.
When the first take-profit level (TP1) is reached and a second target (TP2) still exists above it. If there is no TP2, hitting TP1 simply closes the trade and no breakeven leg is created.
No. It removes the downside of an open trade but also stops you out of winners that dip back through their entry before continuing. It reliably improves how a track record looks and does not necessarily improve how much money it makes.
No. If the price gaps below your entry overnight, the exit fills at the open, below the level you chose. A stop is an instruction to exit, not a promise of the price you exit at.
Browse all S&P 500 tickers to see this metric applied to individual companies.
Educational research only — not investment advice.