A stop order sits dormant at your broker until the stock trades at or past a trigger price you chose. At that moment it wakes up and turns into a market order — an instruction to sell (or buy) immediately at whatever price is available. It is the standard way to cap the loss on a position without having to watch the screen.
A stop order has two lives. Before the trigger it is invisible to the market — it is not sitting in the order book, and nobody can trade against it. Once the stock trades at or through your trigger price, the order activates and is submitted as a market order: fill me now, at the best price available. That second step is the one beginners miss, and it is where the surprises come from.
The most common use is protective: you own a stock at $50, you decide you are not willing to lose more than roughly 10% on the idea, so you place a sell stop at $45. If the stock drifts down to $45 the order fires and you are out. You do not have to be watching, and — more importantly — you do not have to make the decision in the moment, when you will be worst equipped to make it. The whole value of a stop is that you chose the exit while you were still calm.
Stops also work in the other direction. A buy stop placed above the current price is used to enter on a breakout ("only buy if it can actually get through $60"), or to close a short position if it moves against you. The mechanics are identical: dormant until the trigger, then a market order.
A plain stop converts into a market order, so it will fill — but at an unknown price. A stop-limit converts into a limit order instead: you name both a trigger price and a floor below which you refuse to sell. That bounds how bad the fill can be, at the cost of the guarantee that you get out at all.
The trade-off is genuinely uncomfortable, and there is no free option. In a crash, a plain stop gets you out at a terrible price; a stop-limit may not get you out at all, leaving you holding a position that keeps falling below your limit. Which is worse depends on what you were protecting against. If the point of the stop was to survive a disaster, a fill you dislike beats no fill at all.
Example (illustrative — invented numbers chosen to show the mechanics, not a real stock and not a recommendation). You own a share bought at $50 and place a sell stop at $45.
Orderly case: the stock drifts down through $45 during a normal session. Your stop triggers and fills at $44.97 — a hair below the trigger, which is expected, because the trigger only tells the order when to wake up, not what price to accept. You lost about $5 a share, roughly what you planned.
Gap case: the company reports bad news after the close. The stock last traded at $48, and it opens the next morning at $38. Your trigger of $45 is breached instantly, the stop converts to a market order, and it fills near $38. You lost $12 a share, not the $5 you planned. Nothing malfunctioned — the price simply never traded at $45. This is the single most important thing to understand about stops, and it is why position size, not the stop, is your real defense against a catastrophic loss.
The naive approach is a round percentage: "I always use a 5% stop." The problem is that 5% means completely different things on a sleepy consumer-staples stock and on a biotech that routinely swings 6% in a day. On the volatile name, a 5% stop is not risk management — it is a near-certainty of being stopped out by ordinary noise. This is why serious stop placement is scaled to the stock’s own volatility, typically using ATR (average true range) rather than a flat percentage, so the distance stays proportionate to how much the stock actually moves.
The other principle: a stop should sit at a price that means something about your thesis, not at a price that means something about your wallet. Placing it just under a support level or a structural invalidation level asks the right question — "at what price am I demonstrably wrong?" Placing it at "the most I feel like losing today" asks a question the market has no opinion about, and the market will happily take you out anyway.
It feels like a guarantee and is not. "My downside is capped at 10%" is true on a quiet Tuesday and false on the morning of a profit warning. Any risk plan whose survival depends on the stop filling at the trigger is not a risk plan.
It converts a paper loss into a realised one — sometimes right at the bottom. Tight stops on a noisy stock produce a distinctive, demoralising pattern: you get shaken out on a spike, the stock recovers without you, and you have paid real money for a move that never actually invalidated your idea. A stop that is too tight is not a conservative choice. It is a reliable way to bleed.
And a stop says nothing about whether the trade was worth taking. It bounds the loss; it does not create an edge. The decision that actually protects you is made before the entry — how much capital is at risk, and whether the potential reward justified accepting the loss you just took.
An order that does nothing until the stock reaches a trigger price you set, at which point it becomes a market order and sells (or buys) immediately at whatever price is available. Most often used to cap the loss on a position you already own.
Yes — "stop-loss" is the everyday name for a sell stop placed below your entry price to limit a loss. The order type is the same; the name describes what you are using it for.
No. Because it converts to a market order once triggered, the fill can be well below your trigger if the stock gaps — overnight, on earnings, or in a crash. The price simply never traded at your level. Position size, not the stop, is your real protection against a catastrophic loss.
A stop becomes a market order: it fills, but at an unknown price. A stop-limit becomes a limit order: it will not fill below the price you name, which bounds a bad fill but risks not getting you out at all if the stock keeps falling.
Far enough that ordinary noise in that particular stock will not hit it. A flat 5% means very different things on a calm stock and a volatile one, which is why stop distance is normally scaled to volatility (ATR) and placed at a level that would actually invalidate your reason for being in the trade.
Browse all S&P 500 tickers to see this metric applied to individual companies.
Educational research only — not investment advice.